Archive for the 'Figure' Category

21
Apr
09

Rejects?

bwlogo

picture-7

picture-5

20
Apr
09

Cosmopedia

Κόσμος + παιδεία —> the comprehensive organization of knowledge.

The ultimate, all-encompassing, information archive.

Pierre Levy’s “cosmpopedia” vision of the Web as knowledge space suggests a deterritorialization of knowledge with misleadingly democratizing undertones (at least to participatory culture enthusiasts such as Henry Jenkins).  The advocating of the democratization of access to online information does not necessarily imply a simultaneous advocation of the democratization of knowledge production. When it comes to the provision and creation of knowledge in cyberspace, information is still -for the most part- organized under an implicit hierarchy that assigns legitimacy and authority accordingly (or, alternatively, it exists in a random and chaotic state and is thus not easily searchable and retrvievable to outsiders).  This is one way of filtering out “unnecessary” information/ web junk, but it inevitably means that an oligarchy (compared to the number of people who use the Internet) gets to determine what is unnecessary and what is considered of substance. Yes, the creative bounds are much more relaxed in cyberspace and more people can share their contributions, but there are still systems that help us determine what is “real” and what is “fake”, what is from a legitimate source and what is unreliable (e.g. website ratings, website reputation etc).

Conversely, we could also cautiously say that new media have changed (or, rather, expanded) not only the ways in which we access and process information, but also the ways in which information is organized and accumulated. Arguably, we are becoming less responsible for the information we share online. Case in point: this very blog. I do not fully cite my sources. Sometimes I paraphrase too loosely. I mix and match with no coherent transitions. My writing is haphazard.  But does that change the legitimacy of the information I have to share? Does it inevitably make it less reliable?Perhaps, but at least I am putting my thoughts out there. Will the future break down the still-existent barriers between the professional and the amateur, the academic and the non-scholarly? While this scenario seems to pave the way towards a more democratic access to information, it will probably not ameliorate the *quality* of information-production. It will, instead, make the quality of information more diverse, without necessarily improving or expanding it.

But for the sake of argument, let us consider the potential of the Web as archive and a site of  knowledge-production alongside Levy’s assertion that:  “no one knows everything, everyone knows something, all knowledge resides in humanity.” Will electracy lead the way towards a true cosmopedia, same as the one originally envisioned by the Ancient Greeks? According to Levy, cosmopedia “serves as a site of collective discussion, negotiation, and development… Unanswered questions will create tension within cosmopedic space, indicating regions where invention and innovation are required.” In light of this, electracy combined with heuretics can contribute to the expansion of an archive of knowledge, where information is accumulated through idea negotiation, exchange and collaboration.

Nevertheless, the question remains: who will organize this information in a way that is easily accessible and easy to navigate?  We may not need “gatekeepers” in the future, but we will still need referees, right? Of course, then the question that persists is whether this task will be open to “experts” and non-experts alike, and/or whether it will rest on a combination of the two groups.  The premise of electracy is that it’s “easy” or intuitive in some ways, and thus everyone can potentially gain mastery over the same skillset. However, heuretics is what will separate the “just” electrate from those who use electracy to invent. Just because someone can write does not mean they can produce something brilliant; the same goes for electracy.

Will heuretics within the electracy apparatus produce something useful/practical (in any way you choose to define that), or just something new?

Do I have anything to say – or does the network already take care of it? Mongrel  – NetMonster

17
Apr
09

Everything is Intertwingled?

Intertwingularity is not generally acknowledged, people keep pretending they can make things deeply hierarchical, categorizable and sequential when they can’t. Everything is deeply intertwingled – Ted Nelson

ordinaryhypertext

According to Educational Technology magazine, “Digital convergence brings four (previously) distinct industry sectors in collaboration/competition with each other. Thus, we have Media/Entertainment, PC/Computing, consumer electronics, and telecommunications industries all interacting more closely with each other than ever before. This version of digital convergence is happening all around us.”

Even though I do not think that the four industry sections were necessarily “distinct” prior to digital convergence to begin with, it is undeniable that with the advent of the Internet the convergence possibilities have multiplied.  Nevertheless, the digital and the academic have not (yet?) converged. As hierarchical structures are still in place – albeit temporarily displaced at times – some educational institutions (or, at least, some educators) are embracing the digital and manage to successfully incorporate it into pedagogical techniques.

Convergence misleadingly implies a smooth fusion of two supposedly discrete entities that have forged a symbiotic relationship. But, of course, convergence is the term we use for lack of a more adequate word.

While it is tempting to generalize the impact of digital learning on the quality of education on a global scale, the truth is that some countries cannot keep up. I want to talk about what I know, so I will focus on Europe – and specifically Greece- for the time being. Is Greece’s educational system on a par with the rest of Europe? Well, of course that depends on which European countries we are focusing on. Despite the European Union’s attempts to homogenize Europeanize standardize its participating members (e.g. in terms of exchange currency, educational language, and anglicized place naming), the educational system is still not uniform in terms of standards and quality. But should it be? Wouldn’t that mean that quality will subsequently be standardized and undiversified?

The Aftermath of the Riots?  – - – Digital Learning in Greece – - –

The introduction of digital learning in Greece might not be directly related to the rioters demands and the public’s disillusion with the Greek educational system. I am not trying to see the positive in the disaster here. It seems to me that the promotion of digital learning is more related to the allegedly impending recession that was looming even before the riots began.

In an attempt to enhance digital literacy, the Hellenic Republic is strengthening ICT infrastructure and supporting the development of digital content and educational software. The Ministry of Education and Religious Affairs wishes to modernize the administration of education via the incorporation of ICT into pedagogical strategies in all levels of education. The Ministry is also planning to introduce informatics as a subject in high schools and technical schools. In addition, three new projects have been proposed by the Ministry of Economy and Finance and the Ministry of National Education and Religious Affairs. The tentative names of these projects/ campaigns are: Get Digital, Portable Computer for Every Student, and Blog Out.

This seems promising, but there have been other projects prior to these ones that have never officially been launched.

Perhaps I can get myself a job in Greece if I ever finish my degree. Perhaps by then they will introduce Film and Media Studies in higher education. And perhaps students might actually be interested in enrolling. One can only hope. . .

latefragmentscript

Most of my family thinks I am making movies in grad school. They do not understand what the point is in studying film without actually producing it…

17
Apr
09

Eurovision

eurovision

http://eurovision.ert.gr/

Greece has one of the worst records in the European Union for racism against ethnic minorities. Anti-immigrant sentiment is still high, especially against ethnic Albanians, who form the largest minority. Until the 1990s, the BBC notes, Greece had been an extremely homogenous society. Even though Greece is gradually becoming more ethnically (but not yet racially) diverse, there is no real sense of multi-ethnic integration.

No wonder xenophobia is a word of Greek origin.

This is one sociopolitical aspect where the Cypriot attitude is in agreement with mother Greece

Wiki says: Georgios Kyriacos Panayiotou (Greek: Γεώργιος Κυριάκος Παναγιώτου, born 25 June 1963) best known as George Michael, is a two-time Grammy Award winning, English singer-songwriter, who has had a career as frontman of the duo Wham! as well as a soul-influenced, solo pop musician.

He has sold over 110 million records worldwide, encompassing 12 British #1 singles, 7 British #1 albums, 10 US #1 singles, and 2 US #1 albums. His 1987 debut solo album, Faith became one of the best selling albums of all time, as well as the first album to produce six top 5 singles in the United States. It has sold over 20 million copies worldwide.

All four of his solo studio albums have all reached #1 on the U.K. charts and have gone on to become huge international successes.

05
Apr
09

Cinematic Mis-mnemonics

I would like to bring myself back in touch with my culture. But I have restricted means to do so. I thought America was the land where anything can happen. I thought  cyberspace could produce a surrogate culture for me. I guess I will have to make do with whatever I can find – even if it is reductive and offensive to me. And kind of funny at the same time.  Cinematically manufactured mythologies.

Locating the feeling visually, through cinematic and televisual detours:

firerage

04
Apr
09

Texts and Signs

shaw2

Experimentation with the branching out stucture of (hyper)texts and signs is now commonplace in digital art practices (among other fields).  Artists like Jeffrey Shaw use this metaphor to forge varying cosmologies of  digital spaces.  Such cosmologies consist of visual, textual, and aural spaces, which are meant to be traversed by visitors/ users (in the case of “interactive” installations) in non-linear ways.  Art curator Soke Dinkla labels such works as “floating works of art” which create “the urban space of today not just as a moving, fragmentary and non-linear order, but also as a hypertext that can be perceived spatially and explored associatively.”

shaw1

Urban spaces such as Tokyo have the capacity of turning the visitor into a traveler whose decisions structure the text/ space in new ways, depending on individual experiences, personal decisions, and associations.  If we look at Tokyo as a floating work of art, then we can say that Tokyo as an experiential space negotiates between physical experience and intellectual cognition. Any good example of brandscaping taps into its consumers cognitively, viscerally, and emotionally. Even though branding can arguably be seen as a homogenizing act of product standardization – through, paradoxically, differentiation – it can also be a customizable consumer experience simply because consumer responses are not quite uniform. A brand’s polysemy is achieved through the consumers’ varying emotional, intellectual, and visceral responses. Like the immersive installations above, each set of  eyes – and every singular mind – travels to different parts of the space.  Of course, this semblance of diversity is counterbalanced by the homogeneity of the producer-directed [or desired] response, which is always the same: spend money!

shaw3

” The city of today can only be known by an activity of an ethnographical type: one cannot orientate oneself in such a city by means of the book, the address, but by walking and seeing, by familiarity and experience. Here every experience is intense and fragile. It can only be rediscovered through the memory of the trace left behind: to visit a place for the first time therefore means: beginning to wire it: since the the address is unwritten, it needs to create its own script.”  – Roland Barthes, Das Reich der Zeichen

Is Barthes’ analysis applicable to blogs and other kinds of websites? Can one orientate themselves by familiarity (of web navigation) and experience (both practical and emotionally-triggered) ?

Do blogs inevitably create precarious experiences which can only be rediscovered through digital traces? Is this the best response a blog can hope for?

A transient affective response

sea1sea2




Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.